BOLTING OF RED BEET: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2016-2-33-38
Abstract
Results of study of the collection accessions of red beet with different level of bolting resistance are presented. Nature of inheritance of this trait in progeny, and also its connection with other biological and economically valuable characters and properties is shown. Bolting resistant accessions and possibility of its use in breeding are described. The promising initial material is selected and recommended. The most rational solution of the bolting problems in the beet is the development of resistant varieties and hybrids. For this purpose, the early-spring and under-winter planting are used, as well as the seed germination at low (30C) temperatures. The availability of the various initial material studied by modern methods of researches plays a key role. When the collection accessions of beet were studied in the VIR Polar branch (The Murmansk Region), the following genotypes were identified: 1 – non bolting, 2 – weak bolting (less than 10% of bolting plants), 3 – moderately bolting (10-50%), and 4 – high bolting (more than 50% of bolting plants). As a result of screening of a gene pool, the genetic sources of bolting resistance of beet were identified. At its crossing with bolting accessions the dominance of the trait «bolting» and monogenic nature of its inheritance are confirmed. For the purpose of beet breeding for bolting resistance, the symphycarpous varieties characterized by complex biological and agronomic characters (increased yield, cold tolerance, quality of production and resistance to blackleg) are the most usable. The cultivars Banko from Sweden (donor), Podzimnyaya A-0474 (VNIISSOK) and Polyarnaya ploskaya-249 (Polar branch VIR) are recommended as a genetic sources of bolting resistance.
About the Authors
V. I. Burenin
Federal Research Center the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
T. M. Piskunova
Federal Research Center the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
D. V. Sokolova
Federal Research Center the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
Russian Federation
190000, St.-Petersburg, Bolshaya Morskaya Str. 42-44
References
1. Балков И.Я. ЦМС сахарной свеклы. – М., 1990. – 239 с.
2. Буренин В.И. Селекция и семеноводство свеклы в ГДР. – М., 1975. – 137 с.
3. Буренин В.И. Свекла – Beta L.(систематика, генетика, исходный материал и методы селекции). – Л., 1983. – 379 с.
4. Буренин В.И. Генетические ресурсы рода Beta L. (Свекла). – С-Пб., 2007. – 274 с.
5. Буренин В.И., Пискунова Т.М. Адаптивный потенциал рода Beta L. // Тр. по прикл. бот., ген. и сел. – Т. 175. – В. 2. – 2014. – С. 20-32.
6. Буренин В.И., Соколова Д.В. О цветушности столовой свеклы в связи с ее холодостойкостью // Сб. научн. тр. ПАНИ. – С-Пб., 2014. – Вып. 1. – С. 55-66.
7. Вавилов Н.И. Селекция как наука. // Теоретические основы селекции растений. – М.-Л., 1935. – Т. 1. – С. 17-74.
8. Жученко А.А. Проблемы адаптации в селекции, сортоиспытании и семеноводстве с.-х. культур // Сб. «Генетические основы селекции растений». – М., 1995. – С. 3-19.
9. Зосимович В.П. Виды дикой и происхождение культурной свеклы // Биология и селекция сахарной свеклы. – М., 1968. – С. 7-68.
10. Красочкин В.Т. Свекла // Культурная флора СССР. – Л., 1971. – Т. 19. – С. 7-266.
11. Мережко А.Ф. Проблема доноров в селекции растений. – С-Пб., 1994. – 127 с.
12. Методические указания «Изучение и поддержание мировой коллекции корнеплодов». – Л.: ВИР, 1989. – 117 с.
13. Неговский Н.А. Развитие сахарной свеклы //Биология и селекция сахарной свеклы. – М., 1968. – С. 228-245.
14. Савицкий В.Ф. Генетика сахарной свеклы // Свекловодство. – Киев, 1940. – С. 551-686.
15. Федорова М.И., Буренин В.И. Биология, генетика и селекция столовой свеклы // Энциклопедия рода Beta. – Новосибирск, 2010. – С. 588-596.
16. Abegg F. A genetic Factor for Annual Haibet in beets and sinkage Relationship. – Journ. Agric. Research. – 1936. – V. 53. – №7. – P. 413-512.
17. Bandlow G. Die Genetik der Beta vulgaris – Rьben. – Der Zьchter. – 1995. – Bd. 2. – № 4/5. – S. 104-122.
18. Munerati O. Leredita della tendenza annualiata nella commune barbabietola – Zьchtung – Berlin, 1931., Вd. 2, № 1/2 – S. 1-215.
19. Rцstel H.I. Probleme und Ergebnisse der Zьchtung monocarper tetraploider Zьckerruben. Arch.Zьchtungsforsch. – 1972. – В. 2, H. 4, S. 299-310.
20. Savitsky V.F. Genetische Studien und Zьchtung bei monogermer Zuckerrьben. Z. fur Pflanzenzьсht. – 1958. Bd. 2, H. 4. S. 1-36.
Review
For citations:
Burenin V.I., Piskunova T.M., Sokolova D.V. BOLTING OF RED BEET: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2016;(2):33-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2016-2-33-38
Views:
1339
Email this article 