Donor-acceptor relationships as a criterion for selection of rice plants for productivity: assessment of the harvesting index of the main shoot
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2026-2-12-19
Abstract
Relevance. The article presents the results of studying the production processes of rice agrophytocenoses in order to identify the morphophysiological characteristics of plants associated with the coefficient of economic efficiency of photosynthesis (or harvesting index HI) for improving the evaluation methods in breeding for yield.
Methodology. In a vegetation experiment, photosynthetic and production activity was studied in 5 rice varieties on three backgrounds of mineral nutrition.
Results. Varietal differences in yield on one background of mineral nutrition are not associated with the parameters of photosynthetic activity, but are determined by the nature of the distribution of assimilates formed during photosynthesis among plant organs. Their intensive influx into storage tissues to developing panicles and grain determines the increased productivity of the varieties Rapan 2, Nautilus and Yubileiny 85. The traits of varieties that determine the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus, the distribution of assimilates among plant organs, the size and structure of the biological and economic yield and donor-acceptor relations, which are the leading factor in the production process at the level of the whole plant and agrophytocenosis, have been identified. The harvesting index of the cenosis varied from 35.5 to 50.3% and of the main shoot from 34.7 to 52.1%, the yield varied from 0.652 to 1.124 kg/m2. A high genotypic relationship has been established between the harvesting index (HI) and the yield (0,90±0,25), the grain content of the agrophytocenosis (0,88±0,27) and the weight of grain per plant (0,99±0,03). A high genotypic relationship was established between the harvesting index (Khoz) and yield (0.90±0.25), grain content of the agrophytocenosis (0.88±0.27) and grain weight per plant (0.99±0.03) under optimal nutritional conditions.The analysis has shown similar relationships with the coefficient of economic efficiency of photosynthesis of the main shoot (HI of the main shoot), which allows it to be used for assessing productivity.
About the Authors
M. A. SkazhennikRussian Federation
Mikhail A. Skazhennik – Dr. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Head Laboratory of Physiology
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
V. S. Kovalev
Russian Federation
Victor S. Kovalyov – Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor, Chief Researcher of the Breeding Department
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
L. V. Esaulova
Russian Federation
Lyubov V. Esaulova – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Deputy Director
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
Researcher ID 598408
A. M. Ogly
Russian Federation
Andrey M. Ogly – Head of Breeding Department
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
T. S. Pshenitsyna
Russian Federation
Tatyana S. Pshenitsyna – Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Physiology
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
E. V. Shevchenko
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Shevchenko – Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Physiology
3, Belozerny, Krasnodar, 350921
References
1. Bedenko V.P. Photosynthesis and production process. Orel. 2008. 144 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qqmcvk
2. Kolomeychenko V.V. Production Processes in Crops. Orel: OrelSAU. 2020. 452 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/skpger
3. Tabolenkova G.N., Golovko T.K. Production process of cultivated plants in cold climate conditions. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 2010. 231 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qlhrux
4. Bespalova L.A. Development of the gene pool as the main factor of the third green revolution in wheat breeding. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015:(1);9-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S086958731501003X https://www.elibrary.ru/telwml
5. Reshetneva S.V., Bespalova L.A., Kudryashov I.N., Puzyrnaya O.Yu., Novikov A.V. Comparative analysis of the harvesting index in the genetic and ecological gradient. Transactions of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2022;(102):88-92. https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-102-88-92 https://www.elibrary.ru/qeymup (In Russ.)
6. Skazhennik M.A., Kovalev V.S., Balyasny I.V. The coefficient of economic efficiency of photosynthesis and physiological factors of its increase in grain crops (Review). Rice growing. 2025;2(67):6-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33775/1684-2464-2025-67-2-6-13 https://www.elibrary.ru/khizjv
7. Gadia S., Kumar D. Shivay Y.S. Field-Based Evaluation of Rice Genotypes for Enhanced Growth, Yield Attributes, Yield and Grain Yield Efficiency Index in Irrigated Lowlands of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Sustainability. 2023;15:8793. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118793
8. Girma E., Gereselassie W., Lakew B. Genetic gain in grain yield and associated traits of Ethiopian bread wheat (Triticum aestivium L.) varieties. Inter J. Agri Biosci. 2019;8(1):12-19.
9. Vorobyov N.V., Skazhennik M.A. Physiological foundations of mineral nutrition of rice. Krasnodar. 2005. 194 p. (In Russ.)
10. Balyasny I.V., Skazhennik M.A., Kovalev V.S., Pshenitsyna T.S. Study of production processes of intensive and extensive rice varieties. Rice growing. 2023;3(60):14-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33775/1684-2464-2023-60-3-14-20 https://www.elibrary.ru/wxcbdm
11. Rai S.K., Chandra R., Suresh B.G. Genetic diversity analysis of rice germplasm lines for yield attributing traits. International Journal of Life Sciences Research. 2014;2(4):225-228.
12. Tang Liang Gao Hong, Hirooka Yoshihiro, Erect panicle super rice varieties enhance yield by harvest Index advantages in high nitrogen and density conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017;16(7):1467-1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61667-8
13. Wang Yuan-zheng, Idowu Olusegun, Wang Yun Effects of erect panicle genotype and environment interactions on rice yield and yield components. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2023;22(3):716-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.013
14. Mohapatra T., Robin S., Sarla N., Sheshashayee M., Singh A.K., Singh K., Singh N.K., Sevanthi A.M., Sharma R.P. EMS induced mutants of upland rice variety Nagina22: Generation and characterization. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2014;(80):163-172.
15. Vishwakarma C., Krishna G.K., Kapoor R.T., Mathur K., Dalal M., Singh N.K., Mohapatra T., Chinnusamy V. Physiological Analysis of Source–Sink Relationship in Rice Genotypes with Contrasting Grain Yields. Plants. 2024;(13):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010062
16. Skazhennik M.A., Vorobyov N.V., Kovalev V.S., Patterns of formation of productivity of intensive and extensive rice varieties. Rice growing. 2018;(1):6-14. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vutgzl
17. Skazhennik M.A., Vorobyov N.V., Kovalev V.S., Formation of yield and elements of its structure of intensive and extensive rice varieties. Rice growing. 2018;(3):13-19. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ppgfwl
18. Esaulova L.V., Lysko I.A., Kovalev V.S. Scientific Support for the Rice Growing Industry in Krasnodar Krai. Rice Growing. 2025;(67):97-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33775/1684-2464-2025-67-2-97-100 https://www.elibrary.ru/gumavf
19. Skazhennik M.A., Vorobyov N.V., Doseeva O.A. Methods of physiological research in rice growing. Photosynthetic activity and production processes of phytocenoses. Orel. 2014. P.109-128. (In Russ.)
20. Sheudzhen A.Kh., Bondareva T.N. Agrochemistry. Part 2. Methodology of agrochemical research: textbook. Krasnodar: KubSAU. 2015. 703 p. (In Russ.)
21. Dzyuba V.A. Multifactorial Experiments and Methods of Biometric Analysis of Experimental Data. Krasnodar. 2007. 76 p. (In Russ.)
22. Vorobyov N.V., Skazhennik M.A., Kovalev V.S. Production process in rice varieties. Krasnodar: Prosveshchenie-Yug. 2011. 199 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/iiqnfk
23. Vorobyov N.V. Physiological bases of rice yield formation. Krasnodar: Prosveshchenie-Yug. 2013. 405 p. (In Russ.)
24. Bedenko V.P. Kolomeychenko V.V. Fundamentals of the production process of plants. Orel, 2003. 260 p. (In Russ.)
25. Gulyaev B.I. Photosynthesis and plant productivity: problems, achievements, research prospects. Physiol. and Biochem. Cult. Plants. 1996;28(1-2):15-35. (In Russ.)
26. Vorobyov N.V, Skazhennik M.A., Sheudzhen A.Kh., Kovalev V.S. Features of the production process in extensive and intensive rice varieties. Reports of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 2013;(4):7-8. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qcnhkv
27. Mokronosov A.T. Relationship between photosynthesis and growth function. Photosynthesis and production process. Moscow: Nauka. 1988. P.109-121. (In Russ.)
28. Skazhennik M.A., Vorobyov N.V., Kovalev V.S., Udzhuhu A.Ch., Balyasny I.V. Harvesting index and its relationship with the formation of yield and elements of the yield structure of rice varieties. Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. 2017;(2):29-31. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ykusyx
Review
For citations:
Skazhennik M.A., Kovalev V.S., Esaulova L.V., Ogly A.M., Pshenitsyna T.S., Shevchenko E.V. Donor-acceptor relationships as a criterion for selection of rice plants for productivity: assessment of the harvesting index of the main shoot. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2026;(2):12-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2026-2-12-19
JATS XML

































