Preview

Vegetable crops of Russia

Advanced search

Effect of fertilisers on yield and biochemical quality indicators of table root crops

https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-3-95-99

Abstract

Relevance. High rates of growth and development of Russian industry, as well as population growth, create the need for increased harvesting of vegetables, including carrots and beetroot. Nowadays, for successful development of vegetable production it is important to improve not only yields but also the quality of products. The population requires ecologically clean and balanced nutrition, and vegetables contain carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, enzymes, hormones, organic acids, minerals and other substances, and also serve as a rich source of natural antioxidants. The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the effect of different systems of fertiliser application on the yield of root crops and on their biochemical quality indicators.

Material and Methods. The effect of different systems of fertiliser application on biochemical quality indicators of red beet variety Mulatka and table carrot variety Losinoostrovskaya 13 was studied on alluvial meadow soil in the conditions of the non-Black Earth region of Russia. Four variants of fertiliser application were considered in the experiment: mineral fertilisers as a standard conventional system of fertiliser application for the given region; organic fertilisers (biocompost); organic fertilisers in combination with root feeding with macroelements (NPK) according to the results of plant and soil nutrition diagnostics (plant and soil diagnostics of mineral nutrition was carried out according to the methods of Zerling V.V. (1990) and Magnitsky K.P. (1972)).

Results. As a result of the conducted research carrot yield was 51.2-63.9 tonnes/ha with standard yield 87.4-94.6%, red beet yield 41.7-54.2 tonnes/ha, with standard yield 80.7-92.3%. According to the results of biochemical studies during the harvesting period it was found that the content of dry matter in carrot root crops was within 11.4-12.3%, sugars 7.26-8.22%, carotene 6.38-8.16 mg%, nitrates 73-172 mg/kg; in red beet root crops respectively 13.1-15.0% dry matter, 10.12-11.68% sugars, 112.1-156.2 mg% betanin, 507-969 mg/kg nitrates. The highest yield of root crops was obtained when mineral fertilisers were used and when they were used in combination with organic fertilisers. The quality of root crops increased when organic fertilisers were used in combination with fertilisation with mineral fertilisers.

About the Authors

V. A. Borisov
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Vegetable Growing – branch of the FSBSI Federal Scientific Vegetable Center
Russian Federation

Valery А. Borisov – Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Chief Researcher of the Agrochemistry Sector

500, Vereya village, Ramensky urban district, Moscow region

Researcher ID: J-4718-2018,

Scopus ID: 57213419483

 



S. M. Nadezhkin
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Vegetable Center (FSBSI FSVC)
Russian Federation

Sergei M. Nadezhkin – Dr. Sci. (Biology), Head of Laboratory Analytical Centre FSBSI

14, Selectsionnaya str., VNIISSOK, Odintsovo district,  Moscow region, 143072

Researcher ID: U-4126-2018, Scopus ID: 57193556462 



S. V. Belova
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Vegetable Center (FSBSI FSVC); All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Vegetable Growing – branch of the FSBSI Federal Scientific Vegetable Center
Russian Federation

Sofia V. Belova – PhD student

14, Selectsionnaya str., VNIISSOK, Odintsovo district,  Moscow region, 143072,

500, Vereya village, Ramensky urban district, Moscow region



References

1. Jie L. et al. Effect of potassium fertilization during fruit development on tomato quality, potassium uptake, water and potassium use efficiency under deficit irrigation regime. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;(250). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106831

2. Litvinov S.S. Scientific bases of modern vegetable growing. RASKHN - VNIIO, 2008. 776 p. (in Russ.)

3. Litvinov S.S. Methodology of field experiment in vegetable growing. M.: RASKHN - VNIIO, 2011. 650 p. (in Russ.)

4. Zhou R. et al. Environmental changes impact on vegetables physiology and nutrition – Gaps between vegetable and cereal crops. Science of The Total Environment. 2024;(933). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173180

5. Armel L. et al. Urban effects on the adoption of soil conservation practices in urban and peri urban vegetable production of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Scientific African. 2024;(26). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02342

6. Церлинг В.В. Диагностика питания сельскохозяйственных культур: Справочник. М.: Агропромиздат, 1990. 235 с.

7. Magnitsky K.P. Diagnostics of plant needs in fertilisers. Moscow, «Moskovsky Rabochiy», 1972. 272 p. (in Russ.)

8. Borisov V.A., System of fertilisation of vegetable crops. Moscow: FGBNU «Rosinformagroteh», 2016. 392 p. (in Russ.)

9. Maatallah S. et al. Yield and biochemical fruit quality of irrigated peach cultivars subjected to conventional farmer’s fertilization practices in warm production area. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2024;(129). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106121

10. Nookaraju A., Upadhyaya C.P., Pandey S.K., Young К.E., Hong S.J., Park S.K., Park S.W. Molecular approaches for enhancing sweetness in fruits and vegetables. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010;127(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.014

11. Borisov V.A., Yanchenko E.V., Uspenskaya O.N. Effect of fertilizers on the preservation of vegetables and changes in their quality during storage. Agrohimia. 2022;(12):7-13. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188122120043 https://www.elibrary.ru/amjcrv

12. Borisov V.A., Romanova A.V., Maslovsky S.A., Andrianov S.A. et al. Technology of cultivation and storage of new varieties and hybrids of vegetable crops (Recommendations). М., 2004. 45 p. (in Russ.)

13. Amorim D.S., Amorim I.S., Chisté R.C., Filho J.T., Fernandes F.A.N., Godoy H.T. Effects of cold plasma on chlorophylls, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and betalains. Food Research International. 2023;(167):112593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112593

14. Chevalier W. et al., Evaluation of pedoclimatic factors and cultural practices effects on carotenoid and sugar content in carrot root. European Journal of Agronomy. 2022;(140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126577

15. Marco E. Mng’ong’o, Selly D. Msungu, Golden harvest: Nitrogen’s impact on maize carotenoids. Food and Humanity. 2024;(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100371

16. Razzaq M., Akram N.A., Ashraf М., Naz H., Al-Qurainy F., Interactive effect of drought and nitrogen on growth, some key physiological attributes and oxidative defense system in carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2017;(225):373-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.055

17. Atanas Pavlov, Vasil Georgiev, Mladenka Ilieva. Betalain biosynthesis by red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) hairy root culture. Process Biochemistry. 2005;(40):1531–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.001

18. Salachas G. et al. Enhancing bioactive compounds accumulation in red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants by managing N nutrition. The identification of the ‘critical’ zone as a cultivation technique. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2022;(188):21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.08.003


Review

For citations:


Borisov V.A., Nadezhkin S.M., Belova S.V. Effect of fertilisers on yield and biochemical quality indicators of table root crops. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2025;(3):95-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-3-95-99

Views: 97


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9146 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7132 (Online)