WEEDS RESPONSE TO THE VARIOUS DOSES OF NEW GENERATION HERBICIDE 'VERDICT' IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2014-1-72-75
Abstract
Trial was carried out to survey the different rates of new generation post-emergence herbicide 'Verdict' in four levels involving: 0, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 kg ha-1 to suppress three weeds species; Chenopodium album, Poaceae sp. and Stelaria media. Experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design [CRD] with four treatments in four replications. Weeds growth diminished mostly for verdict 0.5 kg ha-1 and then 0.3 kg ha-1 compared to 0.2 kg ha-1 and control, results of the trial revealed that a satisfactory survival reduction of Chenopodium album, poaceae and also Stelaria media were achieved with labeled-dose of verdict as 0.5 kg ha-1 and also intermediate dose 0.3 kg ha-1. In contrast, the minimum dose 0.2 kg ha-1 had a significantly highest weeds survival about three varieties of mentioned weeds in comparison with other higher doses of herbicide.
About the Authors
Zargar Meisam
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, People's Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
postgraduate of the Department genetics, Plant Production and Protection
Russian Federation
postgraduate of the Department genetics, Plant Production and Protection
P. M. Polityko
Moscow Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture «Nemchinowka» Odintsovo Area
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
Russian Federation
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
E. N. Pakina
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, People's Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Plant Production and Protection
Russian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Plant Production and Protection
References
1. Barros J.F.C., Basch G., De Carvalho M. (2005). Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence graminicide mixture to control Lolium rigidum G. in winter wheat under direct drilling in Mediterranean environment. Crop Protection, 24: 880-887.
2. Barros J.F.C., Basch G., De Carvalho M. (2007). Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence herbicide to control grass and broadleaf weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Protection, 26: 1538-1545.
3. Barros J.F.C., Basch G., De Carvalho M. (2008). Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence graminicide to control Avena sterilis L. and Lolium rigidum G. in no-till wheat under Mediterranean environment. Crop Protection, 27:1031-1037.
4. Barroso, J., D. Ruiz, C. Escribano, L. Barrios, and C. Fernandez Quintanilla. (2009). Comparison of three chemical controlstrategies for Avena sterlis ssp. ludoviciana. Crop Protection 28:393-400.
5. Blackshaw, R.E., O'Donovan, J.T., Harker, K.N., Clayton, G.W., Stugard, R.N. (2006). Reduced herbicide doses in field crops: A review. Weed Biol. Manag. 6, 10-17.
6. Bostrom U., Fogelfors H. (2002). Response of weeds and crop yield to herbicide dose decision – support guidelines. Weed Science, 50: 186-195.
7. Brian P., Wilson B.J., Wright K.J., Seavers G.P., Caseley J.C. (1999). Modelling the effect of crop and weed on herbicide efficacy in wheat. Weed Research, 39: 21-35.
8. Fernandez-Quintanilla C., Barroso J,. Recasens J., Sans X., Torner C., S?nchez M.J Del Arc. (2000). Demography of Lolium rigidum in winter barley crops: analysis of recruitment, survival and reproduction. Weed Research, 40: 281-291.
9. Hamill A. S., Weaver S. E., Sikkema P. H., Swanton C. J., Tardif F. J., Ferguson G. M. (2004). Benefits and risks of economic vs. efficacious approaches to weed management in corn and soybean. Weed Technology, 18: 723-732.
10. Medd R.W., Van de Den J., Pickering D.I., Nordblom T. (2001). Determination of environment-specific dose-response relationships for clodinafop-propargyl on Avena spp.Weed Research, 41: 351-368.
11. Navarrete L., Sanchez Del Arco M.J., Gonzales P.R., Taberner A., Tievas M.A. (2000). Curvas de dosis respuesta para avena loca y vallico en cultivos de cebada de invierno. XIX Reunio’n Anual del Grupo de Trabajo Malas Hierbas y Herbicidas, Oviedo. pp. 50-53. (In Spanish).
12. Nikitin N.V., Spiridinov Y.J.and Shestakov V.G. (2010). Scientific and practical aspects of herbicide application technologies in modern crop production. Publishing City, Moscow. 189pp.
13. O'Donovan J.T.K., Harker N., Clayton G.W., Newman J.C., Robinson D., Hall L.M. (2001). Barley seeding rate influences the effects of variable herbicide rates on wild oat. Weed Science, 49: 746-754.
14. Polityko P.M., Parigina M.N., Mazurova A.M., Volpe A.A. and Prokopenko A.G. (2008). Biological, economic, industrial and energetic effectiveness of winter wheat cultivation. Scientific conference «Aspects of selection and technology of crop cultivation». 324-332.
15. Salonen, J., (1992). Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses in spring cereals of different competitive ability. Weed Res. 32, 483-491.
16. Zhang J.S., Weaver E., Hamill A.S. (2000). Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled doses. Weed Technology, 14:106-115.
Review
For citations:
Meisam Z., Polityko P.M., Pakina E.N. WEEDS RESPONSE TO THE VARIOUS DOSES OF NEW GENERATION HERBICIDE 'VERDICT' IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2014;(1):72-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2014-1-72-75
Views:
813
Email this article 