Обзор возможностей и проблем выращивания уличных деревьев в условиях мощеных городских территорий

Уличные деревья давно признаны фактором, способствующим повышению стоимости жилой недвижимости, и предлагают многочисленные экологические, экономические и социальные преимущества как в жилых, так и в коммерческих районах. Цель данной обзорной статьи — изучить возможности и проблемы, связанные с посадкой деревьев в городских условиях. Однако быстрые темпы урбанизации привели к значительному увеличению непроницаемых поверхностей, что может усилить экологическое давление на деревья. Уличные деревья играют решающую роль в городской жизни, предоставляя широкий спектр преимуществ в жилых и коммерческих зонах, и способствуют благополучию сообществ, предлагая экологические, экономические и социальные выгоды. Тем не менее, расширение непроницаемых поверхностей может усугубить нагрузку на городские экосистемы и городские леса. Эта нагрузка часто заставляет корни деревьев разрастаться в местах, обеспечивающих более благоприятные условия для роста, но, к сожалению, эти места также наносят ущерб инфраструктуре и поднимают дорожное покрытие. Этот ущерб влечет за собой значительные затраты, что побуждает к изучению различных профилактических мер, направленных на сохранение здоровья деревьев и минимизацию повреждений дорожного покрытия. В данной статье представлен всесторонний обзор преимуществ, предоставляемых уличными деревьями, их ценности в сообществах, расходов, связанных с неконтролируемым ростом корней и повреждением дорожного покрытия, и, что наиболее важно, путем внедрения этих профилактических мер городские территории могут сохранить многочисленные преимущества, предоставляемые деревьями, одновременно смягчая негативные последствия, связанные с их ростом. Представлены последние исследования проверенных мер по предотвращению повреждения дорожного покрытия и стимулированию роста деревьев.

1. Haase D., Guneralp B., Dahiya B., Bai X., Elmqvist T. Global urbanization. The Urban Planet: Knowledge Towards Sustainable Cities. 2018;(19):326-339.

2. Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J. The increase of impervious cover and decrease of tree cover within urban areas globally (2012–2017). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020;(49):126638.

3. Namin S., Xu W., Zhou Y., Beyer K. The legacy of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation and the political ecology of urban trees and air pollution in the United States. Social Science & Medicine. 2020;(246):112758.

4. Nowak D.J., Hirabayashi S., Bodine A., Greenfield E. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environmental pollution. 2014;(193):119-129.

5. Gilstad-Hayden K., Wallace L.R., Carroll-Scott A., Meyer S.R., Barbo S., Murphy-Dunning C., Ickovics J.R. Research note: Greater tree canopy cover is associated with lower rates of both violent and property crime in New Haven, CT. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2015;(143):248-253.

6. Troy A., Grove J.M., O’Neil-Dunne J. The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban–rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landscape and urban planning. 2012;106(3):262-270.

7. Willis K.J., Petrokofsky G. The natural capital of city trees. Science. 2017;356(6336):374-376.

8. Suchy A.K., Anderson E.C., Fork M.L., Lin L., Locke D.H., Groffman P.M., Grove J.M., LaDeau S.L., Rosi E.J., More green, fewer problems: landcover relates to perception of environmental problems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2023;21(3):124-130.

9. Alonzo M., Baker M.E., Gao Y., Shandas V. Spatial configuration and time of day impact the magnitude of urban tree canopy cooling. Environmental Research Letters. 2021;16(8):084028.

10. Ziter C.D., Pedersen E.J., Kucharik C.J., Turner M.G. Scaledependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;16(15):7575-7580.

11. Hoffman J.S., Shandas V., Pendleton N. The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: a study of 108 US urban areas. Climate. 2020;(1):12.

12. Sinha P., Coville R.C., Hirabayashi S., Lim B., Endreny T.A., Nowak, D.J. Modeling lives saved from extreme heat by urban tree cover✰. Ecological modelling. 2021;(449):109553.

13. Le Roux D.S., Ikin K., Lindenmayer D.B., Manning A.D., Gibbons P. The value of scattered trees for wildlife: Contrasting effects of landscape context and tree size. Diversity and Distributions. 2018;24(1):69-81.

14. Seamans G.S. Mainstreaming the environmental benefits of street trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2013;12(1):2-11.

15. Morgenroth J., Buchan G., Scharenbroch B.C. Belowground effects of porous pavements—Soil moisture and chemical properties. Ecological engineering. 2013;(51):221-228.

16. D’Amato N.E., Sydnor T.D., Knee M., Hunt R., Bishop B. Which comes first, the root or the crack? Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF). 2002;28(6):277-282.

17. Mullaney J., Lucke T., Johnson T., Cameron D., Moore G. Pervious paving systems: potential use for promoting street tree health, reducing pavement damage and reducing stormwater flows. In SUDSnet International Conference. 2012.

18. Mullaney J., Lucke T. Practical review of pervious pavement designs. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2014;42(2):111-124.

19. Wang C.W., Tu H.M. Evaluating criteria weights of street tree selection between residents and experts. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 2023;19(4):633-646.

20. Saebo A., Borzan Ž., Ducatillion C., Hatzistathis A., Lagerström T., Supuka J., García-Valdecantos J.L., Rego F., Van Slycken J. The selection of plant materials for street trees, park trees and urban woodland. Urban forests and trees: A reference book, 2005. pp.257-280.

21. Roloff A., Korn S., Gillner S. The Climate-Species-Matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2009;8(4):295-308.

22. Sjöman H., Nielsen A.B. Selecting trees for urban paved sites in Scandinavia–A review of information on stress tolerance and its relation to the requirements of tree planners. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2010;9(4):281-293.

23. Kirkpatrick J.B., Davison A., Daniels G.D. Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities. Landscape and urban planning. 2012;107(2):147-158.

24. Galenieks A. Importance of urban street tree policies: A Comparison of neighbouring Southern California cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017;(22):105-110.

25. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T., Michael Y.L., Prestemon J.P., Liebhold A.M., Gatziolis D., Mao M.Y., The relationship between trees and human health: evidence from the spread of the emerald ash borer. American journal of preventive medicine. 2013;44(2):139-145.

26. Donovan G.H., Prestemon J.P. The effect of trees on crime in Portland, Oregon. Environment and behavior. 2012;44(1):3-30.

27. Pandit R., Polyakov M., Sadler R. The importance of tree cover and neighbourhood parks in determining urban property values. 2012.

28. Rhodes J.R., Ng C.F., de Villiers D.L., Preece H.J., McAlpine C.A., Possingham H.P. Using integrated population modelling to quantify the implications of multiple threatening processes for a rapidly declining population. Biological conservation. 2011;144(3):1081-1088.

29. Shiflett S.A., Liang L.L., Crum S.M., Feyisa G.L., Wang J., Jenerette G.D. Variation in the urban vegetation, surface temperature, air temperature nexus. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;(579):495-501.

30. Logan T.M., Zaitchik B., Guikema S., Nisbet A. Night and day: The influence and relative importance of urban characteristics on remotely sensed land surface temperature. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2020;(247):111861.

31. Armson D., Stringer P., Ennos A.R. The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2013;12(3):282-286.

32. Escobedo F.J., Seitz J. Urban forests in Florida: Trees control stormwater runoff and improve water quality. 2011.

33. Cappiella K. Urban Watershed Forestry Manual: Part 1: Methods for Increasing Forest Cover in a Watershed (Vol. 4, No. 5). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry. 2005.

34. Tallis M., Taylor G., Sinnett D., Freer-Smith P.. Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011;103(2):129-138.

35. McPherson E.G. Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project (Vol. 186). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 1994.

36. Ferrini F., Fini A. Sustainable management techniques for trees in the urban areas. 2011.

37. Moore G.M. September. Urban trees: worth more than they cost. In Proc. 10 the National Street Tree Symp., Univ. Adelaide/Waite Arboretum, Adelaide. 2009. pp. 7-14.

38. Shashua-Bar L., Pearlmutter D., Erell E. The cooling efficiency of urban landscape strategies in a hot dry climate. Landscape and urban planning. 2009;92(3-4):179-186.

39. Tosti F., Bianchini Ciampoli L., Brancadoro M.G., Alani A. GPR applications in mapping the subsurface root system of street trees with road safety-critical implications. Advances in transportation studies. 2018;(44).

40. Tarran J. September. People and trees, providing benefits, overcoming impediments. In Proceedings of the 10th National Street Tree Symposium (pp. 63-82). Adelaide University Adelaide, Australia. 2009.

41. Donovan G.H., Prestemon J.P. The effect of trees on crime in Portland, Oregon. Environment and behavior. 2012;44(1):3-30.

42. McHale, Melissa R. Gregory McPherson E., Burke Ingrid C. "The potential of urban tree plantings to be cost effective in carbon credit markets. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2007;6(1):49-60.

43. Von Döhren P., Haase D. Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecological indicators. 2015;(52):490-497.

44. Shi F., Meng Q., Pan L., Wang J.. Root damage of street trees in urban environments: An overview of its hazards, causes, and prevention and control measures. Science of the Total Environment. 2023. p.166728.

45. , Smiley E.T. Root pruning and stability of young willow oak. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 2008;34(2):123.

46. Gul A., Kamil O., Eraslan S.. Design of the Urban Street Trees and Problems in Turkey. Miestų želdynų formavimas. 2012;1(9):43-53.

47. Nagendra H., Gopal D. (Street trees in Bangalore: Density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban forestry & urban greening. 2010;9(2):129-137.

48. Nowak D.J., McBride J.R., Beatty R.A. Newly planted street tree growth and mortality. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF). 1990;16(5):124-129.

49. Amir S., Misgav A. A framework for street tree planning in urban areas in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1990;19(3):203-212.

50. Saebo A., Benedikz T., Randrup T.B. Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2003;2(2):101-114.

51. Li Y.Y., Wang X.R., Huang C.L. Key street tree species selection in urban areas. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011;6(15):3539-3550.

52. McHale, Melissa R., Gregory McPherson E., Burke Ingrid C. "The potential of urban tree plantings to be cost effective in carbon credit markets." Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2007;6(1):49-60.

53. Makumbelo E., Paulus S., Luyindula N., Lukoki L. Apport des arbres fruitiers à la sécurité alimentaire en milieu urbain tropical: cas de la commune de Limete-Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. Tropicultura. 2005.

54. Kadiata B.D., Ndamiyehe J.B. Richness of Forest Stands and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Storage in Urban Institutional Lands of Bukavu, DR Congo. Journal of forest and environmental science. 2017;33(2):79-90.

55. Toussaint A., de Meerendre V.K., Delcroix B., Baudoin J.P. Analyse de l’impact physiologique et économique de l’élagage des arbres d’alignement en port libre. BASE. 2002.

56. Fernandes C.O., da Silva I.M., Teixeira C.P., Costa L. Between tree lovers and tree haters. Drivers of public perception regarding street trees and its implications on the urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2019;(37):97-108.

57. , Stas M., Aerts R., Hendrickx M., Dendoncker N., Dujardin S., Linard C., Nawrot T., Van Nieuwenhuyse A., Aerts J.M., Van Orshoven J., Somers B. An evaluation of species distribution models to estimate tree diversity at genus level in a heterogeneous urban-rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2020;(198):103770.

58. Gwedla N., Shackleton C.M. Perceptions and preferences for urban trees across multiple socio-economic contexts in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019;(189):225-234.

59. Richardson E., Shackleton C.M. The extent and perceptions of vandalism as a cause of street tree damage in small towns in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2014;13(3):425-432.

60. Useni Sikuzani Y., Mpibwe Kalenga A., Yona Mleci J., N’Tambwe Nghonda D., Malaisse F., Bogaert J. Assessment of street tree diversity, structure and protection in planned and unplanned neighborhoods of Lubumbashi City (DR Congo). Sustainability. 2020;14(7):3830.

61. Roy S., Davison A., Östberg J. Pragmatic factors outweigh ecosystem service goals in street tree selection and planting in South-East Queensland cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017;(21):166-174.

62. Maco S.E., McPherson E.G. A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities. Journal of Arboriculture. 2003;29(2):84-97.

63. Baldauf R. Roadside vegetation design characteristics that can improve local, near-road air quality. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. 2017;(52):354-361.

64. Singh O. Species Selection in Urban Forestry—Towards Urban Metabolism. In Urban Metabolism and Climate Change: Perspective for Sustainable Cities (pp. 275-293). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2023.

65. Gilman E.F., Sadowski L. Choosing suitable trees for urban and suburban sites: site evaluation and species selection. University of Florida, IFAS Extension. 2007.