Assessment of the nature of inheritance of quantitative traits by F1 hybrids of soft spring wheat in the conditions of the CRNZ
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-6-185-193
Abstract
Relevance. The selection of pairs for crossing is the main task of studying a collection of any crop. It is important to know which parental forms have high variety-forming ability.
Therefore, the aim of our study was to study the nature of the inheritance of quantitative productivity traits by F1 hybrids of soft spring wheat and to identify the most promising combinations for further breeding work.
Material and Methods. Intraspecific F1 hybrids and their parental forms of soft spring wheat were used as the material for the study. The original forms were comprehensively studied (including the index method) in collection nurseries in 2019-2021, differing in meteorological conditions. The most productive varieties were used as maternal forms, and forms with high resistance to diseases, lodging, and high grain quality were used as paternal forms. Based on each maternal form, a series of F1 hybrids of the topcross type were obtained. In F1 hybrids, the inheritance pattern of quantitative traits of the ear of soft spring wheat related to yield (number and weight of grains per ear, number of grains per ear, weight of 1000 grains) was analyzed and phenotypic dominance indices were calculated (according to Griffing), where depression corresponds to the value D < -1; recessive inheritance – at - 1 < D < -0.5; additive effect of genes – at -0.5 < D < 0.5; dominance – at 0.5 < D < 1; heterosis is observed at D > 1. The coefficient of true heterosis was calculated according to Omarov D.S.
Results. It was found that approximately half of the studied hybrid combinations exhibit heterosis in the number of grains in the main spike (about 60%), about 30% of combinations exhibit heterosis in the number of grains in a spikelet, over 60 % – in the weight of grains from the main spike and about 80 % - in the weight of 1000 grains. This serves as indirect evidence of the effectiveness of the index method for selecting pairs for crossing. Promising combinations with a forecast of selection in subsequent generations of transgressive yield lines of spring wheat for CRHZ were identified. For the maternal form Zlata, the best combinations were obtained with pollinators MK No. 41, Sudarynya, Simbirtsit and MK No. 153; for Ekada 66 – Simbirtsit, Zlata; for Granni – Liza, Lada; for KVS Aquilon – AC Taber, Agata, AC Karma; for Ivolga - Granni.
About the Authors
I. N. VoronchikhinaRussian Federation
Irina N. Voronchikhina, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher
Department of Distant Hybridization
127276; 4, Botanincheskaya st.; Moscow
D. A. Shchelkanov
Russian Federation
Danila A. Shchelkanov, Research Engineer
Department of Distant Hybridization
127276; 4, Botanincheskaya st.; Moscow
V. S. Rubets
Russian Federation
Valentina S. Rubets, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Professor, Leading Researcher
Department of Distant Hybridization; Laboratory of Applied Genomics and Private Breeding of Agricultural Plants
127276; 4, Botanincheskaya st.; 127550; 42 Timiryazevskayа st.; Moscow
V. V. Voronchikhin
Russian Federation
Viktor V. Voronchikhin, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Researcher
Department of Distant Hybridization
127276; 4, Botanincheskaya st.; Moscow
References
1. Nadzhodov B.B., Rubets V.S., Pylnev V.V., Voronchikhin I.N. The influence of meteorological conditions on the formation of economically useful traits of spring wheat in the conditions of the Central Russian Agricultural Zone. Bulletin of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2023; (7): 47-64. (In Russ.) doi: 10.26897/0021-342X-2023-6-47-64.
2. Kadushkina V.P., Grabovets A.I. Inheritance of productivity elements in F<sub>1</sub> hybrids of spring durum wheat and the possibility of predicting their prospects. Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2019; (77): 54-56. (In Russ.)
3. Nettevich E.D. Selected works. Breeding and seed production of spring grain crops. Moscow: Nemchinovka, 2008. 348 p. (In Russ.)
4. Tuktarova N.G., Torbina I.V. Manifestation of winter wheat heterosis in the first-year hybrid nursery. Vladimirsky Zemledelets. 2016; 3(77): 35-37. (In Russ.)
5. Krokhmal A.V., Grabovets A.I., Gordinskaya E.A. Features of transgressive variability and morphogenesis in triticale breeding for productivity. Russian Agricultural Science. 2021; (4):17-22. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31857/S2500262721040049.
6. Savchenko V.K. Genetic analysis in network trial crosses. – Minsk.: “Science and Technology”, 1984. 223 p. (In Russ.)
7. Melnikova TV, Melnikov RV Inheritance of quantitative traits by winter soft wheat samples in the conditions of the Republic of Belarus. Agriculture and breeding in Belarus. 2022. (58): 324-330. (In Russ.)
8. Fomenko MA, Grabovets AI, Melnikova OV Inheritance of economically valuable traits by soft winter wheat hybrids in the steppe zone of the Rostov region. Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2016; 4(60): 17-20. (In Russ.)
9. Vyushkov AA Breeding of spring wheat in the Middle Volga region. Samara, 2004. 223 p.
10. Davydova NV, Kazachenko OA, Shirokolava AV Source material for breeding spring soft wheat for yield and resistance to stress factors of the external environment in the conditions of the Central Non-Black Earth Region. Agrarian Russia. 2021; (9):9-13. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30906/1999-5636-2021-9-9-13.
11. Kalinenko I.G. Evaluate wheat hybrids for yield and grain quality in the first generations. Breeding and Seed Production. 1964; (2): 38-41. (In Russ.)
12. Konovalova I.V., Bogdan P.M., Klykov A.G. Comparative analysis of F<sub>1</sub> hybrids of spring soft wheat in reciprocal crossings. Far Eastern Agrarian Bulletin. 2019; 2(50): 39-44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/1999-6837-2019-12018.
13. Kuzmin N.A., Gladysheva O.V., Grigorash O.S. Heterosis effect as an indicator of the selection value of the source material. RSATU Bulletin. 2009; (4): 26-29. (In Russ.)
14. Voronchikhin V.V., Pylnev V.V., Rubets V.S., Voronchikhina I.N. Using the index method in a comprehensive assessment of the triticale genetic collection. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2019; (7): 92-100. (In Russ.)
15. Griffing B.A Concert of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Austral. J. Biol. Sci. 1956. (9).:463-493.
16. Omarov D.S. On the methodology of heterosis assessment in plants. Agricultural biology. 1975; 10 (1):123-127. (In Russ.)
17. Valekzhanin V.S., Korobeynikov N.I. Variability and inheritance pattern of the number of grains per ear in F<sub>1</sub> hybrids of soft spring wheat under the conditions of the Ob forest-steppe of Altai Krai. Bulletin of Altai State Agrarian University. 2020; No. 3 (185): 23-29. (In Russ.)
18. Shindin I.M. Inheritance of quantitative traits in soft spring wheat hybrids under the conditions of the Far East Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2008; No. 46: 66-70. (In Russ.)
19. Tsilke R.A. Genetics, cytogenetics and plant breeding. Collection of scientific papers. Novosibirsk: NGAU, 2003. 620 p. (In Russ.)
20. Valekzhanin V.S., Korobeynikov N.I. Variability and inheritance patterns of 1000-grain weight in diallelic crosses of spring soft wheat. Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex. 20
Review
For citations:
Voronchikhina I.N., Shchelkanov D.A., Rubets V.S., Voronchikhin V.V. Assessment of the nature of inheritance of quantitative traits by F1 hybrids of soft spring wheat in the conditions of the CRNZ. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2025;(6):185-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-6-185-193
JATS XML

































