Features of vegetative propagation of new tulip cultivars of the garden class Triumph during introduction in the Steppe Crimea
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-5-26-31
Abstract
Relevance. Triumph garden class tulips are among the most popular plants for spring flower arrangements, and the issues of their vegetative propagation to obtain planting material within the framework of the import substitution concept in Russia today are relevant. As part of a comprehensive study of new varieties of Triumph garden class tulips for the collection of the Nikitsky Botanical Garden – National Scientific Center, a study was conducted to identify the features of their vegetative propagation when introduced in the conditions of the Steppe Crimea.
Materials and Methods. A study of 39 varieties was conducted in 2022-2023. Based on the results obtained, the average general and commercial coefficients of vegetative propagation of varieties, the yield of commercial bulbs and the resistance of bulbs to fungal diseases during storage were calculated for two years, and differences in these indicators depending on the variety and year were revealed.
Results. It was established that the new varieties of the Triumph class have higher studied indicators than the old varieties of the same garden class, which were studied earlier in the same conditions. At the same time, all the studied varieties had the I type of formation of replacement bulbs, i.e. the yield of commercial bulbs was less than 60%. As a result of the study, 12 varieties were identified that have consistently high yields of commercial bulbs and their stability during storage in the conditions of the Steppe Crimea. We recommend these varieties for propagation for use in landscaping, as well as for breeding work to create new domestic varieties for the conditions of the south of Russia. Keywords: tulips; garden class; variety; general coefficient of vegetative propagation, commercial coefficient of vegetative propagation, type of formation of replacement bulbs, yield of commercial bulbs.
About the Authors
L. A. Rogatenyuk
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Nikitsky Botanical Gardens - National Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila A. Rogatenyuk – Laboratory assistant-researcher of the Steppe Gardening Laboratory of the Crimean Institute of Gardening
298648, Yalta, Nikitsky Descent, 52
V. K. Zykova
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Nikitsky Botanical Gardens - National Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vera K. Zykova – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior researcher of the Laboratory of Floriculture
298648, Yalta, Nikitsky Descent, 52
References
1. Mokhno V.S., Bratukhina E.V. History of tulip classification and possibilities of using their diversity in breeding. Subtropical and ornamental gardening. 2012;(47):99-106. https://elibrary.ru/pietpd (in Russ.)
2. Grosheva E. V., Skripnikova M. K. Features of reproduction and flowering productivity of tulip in the Central Black Earth Region. The bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University. 2012;(2):54-59. https://elibrary.ru/peomlx (in Russ.)
3. Grosheva E.V., Skripnikova M.K. Varietal features of growth, flowering and reproduction of tulips in the Tambov region. Pomiculture and small fruits culture in Russia. 2012;31(1):115-122. https://elibrary.ru/owapyt (in Russ.)
4. Danilina N.N. Varietal features of vegetative propagation of tulips from the collection of the Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Bulletin of the Main Botanical Garden. 2018;1(204):19-26. https://elibrary.ru/ytxubi (in Russ.)
5. Kudryavtseva V.M. Tulips. Minsk: Polymya, 1987. 240 p. (in Russ.)
6. Amano M., Kanamori M., Imai F. A method of bulb yield prediction in tulip. Acta Horticulture. 2005;(673):745-749.
7. Cheal W.F., Hewitt E.J. Effects of Major Nutrients on Two Varieties of Tulip Grown in Sand Culture. Journal of Horticultural Science. 1962;37(2):134-140.
8. Lyakh V.M. On the reasons for the accumulation of small fraction bulbs during commercial cultivation of tulips. Subtropical and ornamental horticulture. 2013;(48):122-137. https://elibrary.ru/qyykfz (in Russ.)
9. Bellinazzo F., Manders I, Heidemann B., Aguirre Bolanos M., Stouten E., Busscher J., Abarca D., van der Wal F., Carnier Dornelas M., Angenent G., Proveniers M., Nijveen H., Immink R. Differential growth and flowering capacity of tulip bulbs and the potential involvement of phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins (PEBPs). Biology Direct. 2025;20(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-025-00625-y
10. Aleksandrova L.M. Introduction variety evaluation and features of vegetative propagation of tulips in the steppe Crimea. Yalta. 1995. 27 p. (in Russ.)
11. Zaitseva E.N. Tulips. Moscow: Agricultural Literature, 1958. 87 p. (in Russ.)
12. Mukhina O.A. Assortment of tulips for the forest-steppe of the south of Western Siberia. Siberian Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 2008;11(191):26-32. (in Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jubdlp
13. Biryukova O.A. Vegetative productivity of hybrid tulip varieties. Proceedings of the Volga State Technological University. Series: Technological. 2017;(5);5-8. https://elibrary.ru/zdmipv (in Russ.)
14. Brovkina T.Ya., Fomenko T.V. Agrobiological assessment of tulip varieties in the conditions of the botanical garden of KubGAU. Ecological Bulletin of the North Caucasus. 2024;20(1):68-73. (in Russ.)
15. Lukyanova E.A., Khubulova E.R. Economic and biological assessment of zoned tulip varieties in the Michurinsky district. Science and Education. Electronic journal. 2022;5(4). https://elibrary.ru/wcpxeb (in Russ.)
16. Kumar R., Sharma O.C., Singh D.V. Screening of tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.) germplasm for quality cut flower and bulb production. Indian Journal of Horticulture 2017;74(2):251-257. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2017.00051.2
17. Aleksandrova L.M. Ability to vegetative propagation of tulip varieties of the garden class Triumph in the conditions of the Steppe Crimea Bull. State Nikitsky Botanical Garden. 2017;(125):144-149. https://www.elibrary.ru/zujxkh (in Russ.)
18. Bylov V.N., Zaitseva E.N. Technology of growing tulip bulbs for forcing Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1986. 56 p. (in Russ.)
19. Aleksandrova L.M., Rogatenyuk L.A. Guidelines for the cultivation of Tulipa L. in Crimea. Simferopol: Arial, 2017. 48 p. (in Russ.)
20. Saifullin R.G., Lobachev Yu.V., Beketova G.A., Kurasova L.G. Selection of standard varieties for field experiments of the State Variety Network. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2014;(6):33-34. https://www.elibrary.ru/sbzmvh (in Russ.)
21. Bolgov V.I., Evsyukova T.V., Kozina V.V, Pustynnikov V.I. Methodology of primary variety study of flower crops Moscow: Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 1998. 40 p. (in Russ.)
22. GOST 28849-90 Interstate standard. Bulbs and corms of flower crops. Technical conditions. (approved and put into effect by the Resolution of the USSR State Committee for Product Quality Management and Standards dated 29.12.1990 No. 3608). Moscow: Standartinform, 2006. 10 p. (in Russ.)
23. Grosheva E.V., Skripnikova E.V. Fungal diseases of tulip bulbs in the Tambov region. Subtropical and ornamental gardening. 2012;(46):199-206. https://www.elibrary.ru/phyetf (in Russ.)
24. Salybekova N. N., Serzhanova A. E., Turmetova G. Zh. Evaluation of resistance of cultivated tulip varieties to diseases. Technologies of food and processing industry of the agro-industrial complex – healthy food products. 2024;(3):162-167. https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-6447-2024-3-162-167 https://www.elibrary.ru/wwgipq (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rogatenyuk L.A., Zykova V.K. Features of vegetative propagation of new tulip cultivars of the garden class Triumph during introduction in the Steppe Crimea. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2025;(5):26-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2025-5-26-31
Views:
143
Email this article 