Preview

Vegetable crops of Russia

Advanced search

Biochemical composition of three Opuntia species O. humifusa, O. phaeacantha, O. engelmannii var. lidheimeri. Prospects of their utilization

https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2024-5-64-72

Abstract

Relevance. Opuntia distinguished by high adaptability is widespread in many countries of the world. Tolerance to water deficiency and high biological activity provide prospects of its cultivation for food and pharmaceutical industry. In Russia Opuntia is grown in the Crimea, Caucasus, Donbass, Astrakhan region and even in the Central Russia. Evaluation of the Opuntia cultivation efficiency in the Crimea for various utilization supposes the importance of its biochemical characteristics which variability greatly depends on the place of habitat. 
Materials and Methods. Total antioxidant activity and titratable acidity were determined using titration methods, polyphenol content –using spectrophotometric method, monosaccharide and total sugar concentrations were assessed via reaction with ferricyanide, mucilage levels were determined gravimetrically.
Results. Investigation of cladode, inflorescence and fruit biochemical parameters of three Opuntia species: O. humifusa, O. phaeacantha, O. engelmannii, – gathered at the Southern and South-Eastern part of the Crimean peninsular revealed wide variability of fruit mucilage (4.3-16.56% d.w.), sugar and total antioxidant activity. Polyphenol content decreased according to: inflorescence (18.4-21.0) > fruit (11.7-18) > cladodes (10.2-20.0). Fruit monosaccharide content reached (6.2-31) % while in cladodes these values were in the range of 8.1-16.0%. Total sugar content was equal to 32.6-95% in fruit and 15.5-29.7% in cladodes. Concentration of selenium as a natural antioxidant was higher in the cladodes (102-176 µg/kg d.w.) than in fruit (46.8-72 µg/kg d.w.). The highest levels of the total antioxidant activity and titratable acidity were registered in O. engelmannii while the highest sugar, mucilage and taste index were typical for O. humifusa. Nevertheless, O. humifusa was characterized by the lowest fruit mass (6.0-6.3 g) contrary to O. engelmannii (36-40 g). The results suppose prospects of fruit, cladode and inflorescence utilization in food industry, cosmetics and pharmacology with the preference to O. humifusa.

About the Authors

N. А. Golubkina
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Vegetable Center (FSBSI FSVC)
Russian Federation

Nadezhda A. Golubkina – Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher of Laboratory-Analytical Department

14, Selectsionnaya str., VNIISSOK, Odintsovo district, Moscow region, 143072



N. A. Bagrikova
Federal State Budgetary Institute of Science «Nikita Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Center RAS»
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Bagrikova – Dr. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher of Natural Ecosystems Laboratory

52, Nikitsky spusk, vil. Nikita, Yalta, Republik of the Crimea, 298648



V. A. Lapchenko
T.I.Viazemsky Karadag scientific station – Nature reserve of RAS»
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Lapchenko – Researcher, Department of Biodiversity and Ecological Monitoring

24, Nauki str., Kurortnoye settlement, Feodosia, Republic of Crimea, 298188



H. V. Lapchenko
T.I.Viazemsky Karadag scientific station – Nature reserve of RAS»
Russian Federation

Helene V. Lapchenko – Engineer, Department of Biodiversity and Ecological Monitoring

24, Nauki str., Kurortnoye settlement, Feodosia, Republic of Crimea, 298188



T. S. Naumenko
Federal State Budgetary Institute of Science «Nikita Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Center RAS»
Russian Federation

Tatiana S. Naumenko – Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of aromatic and medicinal plants

52, Nikitsky spusk, vil. Nikita, Yalta, Republik of the Crimea, 298648



G. D. Levko
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Vegetable Center (FSBSI FSVC)
Russian Federation

Gennady D. Levko – Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher

14, Selectsionnaya str., VNIISSOK, Odintsovo district, Moscow region, 143072



References

1. Backeberg C. Das Kakteen lexicon. Enumeratio diagnostic Cactacearum. Jena,1976. 589 p.

2. Anderson E.F. The cactus family. Portland. 2001. 777 p.

3. Hunt D.R. CITES Cactaceae Checklist. England. 2016. 174 p.

4. The Plant List. 2013. Version 1.1. URL: http://www.theplantlist.org/

5. POWO – Plant of the World On-line. 2024. URL: https://powo.science.kew.org/

6. Novoa A., Le Roux, J.J., Robertson, M.P., Wilson, J.R.U., Richardson, D.M. Introduced and invasive cactus species: a global review. AoB PLANTS. 2015;7:plu078. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu078

7. Bagrikova N.A., Ryff L.E., Chichkanova E.S., Perminova YA.A. Features of fruits and seeds of Opuntia (Cactaceae) species naturalized in Crimea. Botanicheskii zhurnal. 2021;106(10):1002-1015 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0006813621100033. https://elibrary.ru/skhenh

8. Le Houérou H.N. Cacti (Opuntia spp.) as a fodder crop for marginal lands in the Mediterranean basin. Acta Hort. 2002;581:21-46. https://doi.org10.17660/ActaHortic. 2002.581.1

9. Mohamed-Yasseen Y., Barringer S.A., Splittstoesser W.E. A note on the uses of Opuntia spp. in Central/North America. J. Arid Environ. 1996;32:347353.

10. Nobel P.S. Environmental Biology, in: Barbera, G., Inglese, P., PimientaBarrios, E. (Eds.), Agro-ecology, Cultivation and Uses of Cactus Pear. FAOPlant Production and Protection Paper, Rome. 1995;132:36-48.

11. Ramadan M.F., Ayoub T.E.M., Rohn S. Opuntia spp.: Chemistry, bioactivity and industrial application. – Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-78444-7

12. Afanasyev V.E. On methods of immigration of new species into the flora of the Astrakhan region. Bulletin of the Astrakhan State Technical University. 2009;1(48):89-91. https://elibrary.ru/kufpvn

13. Byalt V.V. Opuntia Mill. In: Conspectus florae of Eastern Europe. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg; Moscow: KMK; 2012. P. 198-200.

14. Ostapko V.M. Escape in the wild of Opuntia humifusa (Raf.) Raf. in Donbass. Industrial Botany. 2020;20(3):76-81. https://elibrary.ru/zkttdf

15. Bagrikova N.A., Perminova Ya.A. Characteristics and distribution of the Opuntia (Cactaceae) representatives naturalized in Crimea. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2022;183(3):149-160. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2022-3-149-160 https://elibrary.ru/wujyeb

16. Inglese P., Basile F., Schirra M., Cactus per fruit production, in: Nobel, P. S. (Ed.), Cacti. Biology and Uses, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London. 2002. P.163-183.

17. Barba F.J., Garcia C., Fessard A., Munekatac P.E.S., Lorenzo J.M., Aboudiad A., Ouadiad A., Remize F. Opuntia Ficus Indica Edible Parts: A Food and Nutritional Security Perspective. Food Rev. Int. 2020;38(5):930-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1756844

18. Rocchetti G., Pellizzoni M., Montesano D., Lucini L. Italian Opuntia ficusindica Cladodes as Rich Source of Bioactive Compounds with HealthPromoting Properties. Foods. 2018;7(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7020024

19. Dok-Go H., Lee K.H., Kim H.J., Lee E.H., Lee J., Song Y.S., Lee Y.H., Jin C., Lee Y.S., Cho J. Neuro-protective effects of antioxidative flavonoids quercetin, β-dihydroquercetin and quercetin 3-methyl ether, isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. Saboten. Brain Res. 2003;965:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04150-1

20. Stintzing F.C., Herbach K.M., Mosshammer M.R.; Carle, R.; Yi, W.; Sellappan, S.; Akoh, C.C.; Bunch, R.; Felker, P. Color, Betalain Pattern, and Antioxidant Properties of Cactus Pear (Opuntia spp.) Clones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:442–451.

21. Shoukat R., Cappai M., Pia G., Pilia L. An Updated Review: Opuntia ficus indica (OFI) Chemistry and Its Diverse Applications. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:7724. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137724

22. Madrigal-Santillán E., García-Melo F., Morales-González J.A., VázquezAlvarado P., Muñoz-Juárez S., Zuñiga-Pérez C., Sumaya-Martínez M.T., Madrigal-Bujaidar E., Hernández-Ceruelos A. Antioxidant and anticlastogenic capacity of prickly pear juice. Nutrients. 2013;5(10):4145-4158. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5104145

23. Nunez-Castelum J.A., Conzalez-Fernandez R., Hernandez-Herrera A., Campas-Baypoli O. N., Rodriguez-Ramirez R., Lobo-Galo N., Valero-Galvan J. Morphological characteristics, chemical composition and antioxidant activity of seeds by four wild Opuntia species from North of Mexico. JPACD. 2018;20:23-33.

24. Dubeux J.C.B., dos Santos M.V.F., da Cunha M.V., dos Santos D.C., de Almeida Souza R.T., de Mello A.C.L., de Souza T.C. Cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) nutritive value: A review. AFST. 2021;275:114890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114890

25. Golubkina N.A., Kekina H.G., Molchanova A.V., Antoshkina M.S., Nadezhkin S.M., Soldatenko A.V. Plant antioxidants and methods of their uti- lization. Moscow 2020, Unfra-M, 257 p.

26. Swamy P.M. Laboratory Manual on Biotechnology. Rastogi Publications: Meerut, India, 2008. 617 p

27. ISO 750-2013 Fruit and vegetable products. Determination of titratable acidity. 2013. Standartinform, Moscow.

28. Navez B., Letard M., Graselly D., Jost J. ‘Les critéres de qualité de la tomate’, Infos-Ctifl 1999, 155. P. 41-47.

29. Otálora M.C., Wilches-Torres A., Lara C.R., Cifuentes G.R., Gómez Castaño J.A. Use of Opuntia ficus-indica Fruit Peel as a Novel Source of Mucilage with Coagulant Physicochemical/Molecular Characteristics. Polymers. 2022;14:3832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polym14183832

30. Alfthan G.V. A micromethod for the determination of selenium in tissues and biological fluids by single-test-tube fluorimetry. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1984;165:187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)85199-5

31. Prickly pear kompote. 2018. URL: https://nikitasad.ru/bez-rubriki/kompot-iz-opuntsii/

32. Yoon J.-A., Hahm S.-W., Son Y.-S. Nutrients Contents in Different Parts of Prickly Pear (Opuntia humifusa) and Possible Anti-Breast Cancer Effect 2009. Korean J. Food Nutr. 2009;22(4).

33. Obi K., Frolova L., Fuierer P. Preparation and performance of prickly pear (Opuntia phaeacantha) and mulberry (Morus rubra) dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy. 2020;208:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.006

34. Waal H.O. Opuntia ficus-indica and O. engelmannii and its utilisation as processed animal feed. Acta Hort. 2022;1343:18. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1343.18

35. Ngoc L.T.N., Moon J.Y., Lee Y.C. Beneficial Effects of Opuntia humifusa (Korean Cheonnyuncho) on Human Health Based on Antioxidant Properties: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(1):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010174

36. Cha M.N., Jun H.I., Lee W.J., Kim M.J., Kim, M.K., Kim Y.S. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Korean cactus (Opuntia humifusa) fruit. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2013;22:523-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-0130110-0

37. Shin D.-S., Han G.-J., Oh S-G., Park, H.-Y. Functional component analysis and physical property of Cheonnyuncho (Opuntia humifusa) powder. Korean J. Food Preservation. 2015;22(6):838-844. https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2015.22.6.838

38. Adjeroud N., Elabbas S., Merzouk B., Hammoui Y., Felkai-Haddache L., Remini H., Leclerc J.-P., Madani K. Effect of Opuntia ficus-indica Mucilage on Copper Removal from Water by Electrocoagulation-Electroflotation. Technique. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018;811:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.12.081

39. Salehi E., Emam-Djomeh Z., Fathi M., Askari G. Emerging Natural Hydrocolloids. John Wiley & Sons; Chichester, UK: 2019.

40. Bagrikova N.A., Golubkina N.A., Naumenko T.S. Antioxidant status of Opuntia in the Crimea. Int. Conf. ‘The role of collections in preserving the bio- diversity of succulent plants ex situ’ 2023. 16-20.10.23. Moscow State University Botanic Garden Reports, Moscow. 2024;(VII):21-25.

41. Liu H., Xiao C., Qiu, T., Deng, J., Cheng, H., Cong, X., Cheng, S., Rao, S., Zhang, Y. Selenium Regulates Antioxidant, Photosynthesis, and Cell Permeability in Plants under Various Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Plants. 2023;12:44. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010044

42. Sepúlveda E., Saenz C., Aliaga E., Aceituno C. Extraction and Characterization of Mucilage in Opuntia spp. J. Arid Environ. 2007;68(4):534545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv. 2006.08.001

43. Melgar B., Pereira E., Oliveira M., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Extensive profiling of three varieties of Opuntia spp. fruit for innovative food ingredients. Food Res. Int. 2017;101:259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.024

44. Allegra A., Sortino G., Inglese P., Settanni L., Todaro A., Gallotta A. The Effectiveness of Opuntia ficus-indica Mucilage Edible Coating on Post-Harvest Maintenance of ‘Dottato’ Fig (Ficus сarica L.) Fruit. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2017;12:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.04.010


Review

For citations:


Golubkina N.А., Bagrikova N.A., Lapchenko V.A., Lapchenko H.V., Naumenko T.S., Levko G.D. Biochemical composition of three Opuntia species O. humifusa, O. phaeacantha, O. engelmannii var. lidheimeri. Prospects of their utilization. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2024;(5):64-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2024-5-64-72

Views: 189


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9146 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7132 (Online)