Potato viruses of 7 commercial cultivars grown in field Primorsky Krai of Russia
https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2022-1-79-85
Abstract
Scientific relevance. Plant viruses cause a significant economic loss to potato production, especially if plants are infected at early growth stages and infections are mixed. Viral diseases reduce both yield and quality of harvested crops. Detection and identification of plant viruses are key important to prevent their spreading and to achieve potential yield predetermined by characteristics of varieties.
Research methods. Seven potato varieties, bred in Russia and overseas, were used in the field experiment: Smak, Avgustin, Yantar, Laperla, Labella, Red Lady, Sante, Belmonda. Viral infection rate was measured by the percent of plants with symptoms to the total number of plants. In addition to infection frequency, a disease rate was described after visual estimation. Total RNA was isolated from the collected leaves according to Bekesiova I. et al. 1999 [13]. Qualitative and quantitative estimation of plant viruses in the samples were conducted by single-step real-time RT-PCR with fluorescent detection with the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 and commercial kits “Potato Virus X, Y, M, L, S, A, PSTVd-RT” (Syntol Company) according to the official protocol of the kits.
Results. As a result of our research, symptoms of mixed viral infection were described for potato varieties depending on concentrations and proportions of these viruses in a plant. Mixed viral infection in the potato field in Primorsky Krai comprised PVY, PVX, PVA, PVS, PVM, also PLRV and PSTVd.
About the Authors
O. A. SobkoRussian Federation
Olga A. Sobko – Ph.D. student, Junior Researcher at the laboratory of breeding and genetic research of field crops
30 B, Volozhenina st., Timiryazevsky stl., Ussuriysk, Primorsky krai, 692539
P. V. Fisenko
Russian Federation
Petr V. Fisenko – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, acting head of the laboratory of breeding and genetic research of field crops
30 B, Volozhenina st., Timiryazevsky stl., Ussuriysk, Primorsky krai, 692539
I. V. Kim
Russian Federation
Irina V. Kim – Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher, acting head of the laboratory of potato disease diagnostics
30 B, Volozhenina st., Timiryazevsky stl., Ussuriysk, Primorsky krai, 692539
N. V. Matsishina
Russian Federation
Nathalia V. Matsishina –Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, the laboratory of breeding and genetic research of field crops
30 B, Volozhenina st., Timiryazevsky stl., Ussuriysk, Primorsky krai, 692539
References
1. Kolliopoulou A., Kontogiannatos D., Swevers L. The Use of Engineered Plant Viruses in a Trans-Kingdom Silencing Strategy Against Their Insect Vectors. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;(11):917. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00917
2. Pourrahim R., Farzadfar Sh., Golnaraghi A.R., Ahoonmanesh A. Incidence and distribution of important viral pathogens in some Iranian potato fields. Plant Dis. 2007;(91):609-615. DOI:10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0609
3. Ngoh Dooh J.P., Boydoul F.U., Madjerembe A., Tchoupou Tsouala D.B., Hawaou Adagoro D.B., Kosma P., Ambang Z. Inventory of the potato diseases and impact on growth and yield traits in far North Cameroon. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2020;14(8):2826-2836. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i8.14
4. Murphy A. F., Rondon S. I., Moreno A., Fereres A. Effect of Potato virus Y Presence in Solanum tuberosum (Solanales: Solanaceae) and Chenopodium album on Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Behavior. Environmental Entomology. 2018;XX(X):1- 6. DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvy041
5. Sobko O.A., Matsishina N.V., Fesenko P.V., Kim I.V., Didora A.S., Boginskay N.G., Volkov D.I. Viruses in the agrobiocenosis of the potato fields. IOP Conference Serie: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;677(5):052093. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/677/5/052093. (In Russ.)
6. Cervantes F.A., Alvarez J.M. Within plant distribution of Potato Virus Y in hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides): An inoculum source affecting PVY aphid transmission. Virus Research. 2011;(159):194–200. DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2011.05.003
7. Pankhuri S., Sajad U. N., Manoj K. Y., Abhishek D.. Mixed infection of plant viruses: diagnostics, interactions and impact on host. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2020;128(4). DOI:10.1007/s41348-020-00384-0
8. Syller J., Grupa A. Antagonistic within-host interactions between plant viruses: molecular basis and impact on viral and host fitness. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2016;17(5):769–782. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12322
9. The State Register for Selection Achievements Admitted for Usage. Plant varieties: Official Publ.: Moscow, 2021;(1):719. (In Russ.)
10. Ryabushkina N.A., Omasheva M.E., Galiakparov N.N. Specifics of DNA isolation from plant objects. Biotechnology. Theory and practice. 2012;(2):9-26. DOI:10.11134/btp.2.2012.1 (In Russ.)
11. The broad unified CMEA classifier and international classifier of CMEA for potato varieties of section Tuberarium (Dun.) Buk. of genus Solanum L. Leningrad: VIR Publ.; 1977. 60 p. (In Russ.)
12. Panycheva Yu.S., Vasil’ev D.M., Suprunova T.P., Sakharova A.N., Ignatov A.N. Dynamics of infection of potato varieties with virus Y in field conditions. Potato and vegetables. 2019;(5):25-29. DOI: 10.25630/PAV.2019.45.82.006. (In Russ.)
13. Kumar R., Tiwari R. K., Jeevalatha A., Kaundal P., Sharma S., Chakrabarti S.K. Potato viruses and their diagnostic techniques: An overview. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2019;8(6):1932-1944
14. Bekesiova I., Nap J-P., Mlynarova L. Isolation of high quality DNA and RNA from leaves of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 1999;(17):269- 277.
15. Watzinger F., Ebner K., Lion T. Detection and monitoring of virus infections by real-time PCR. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2006;(27):254–298. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.001
16. Nyalugwe E.P., Wilson C.R., Coutts B.A., Jones R.A.C. Biological properties of Potato virus X in potato: Effects of mixed infection with Potato virus S and resistance phenotypes in cultivars from three continents. Plant Dis. 2012;(96):43-54. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0305
17. Karyeija R.F., Kreuze J.F., Gibson R.W., Valkonen J.P.T. Synergistic Interactions of a Potyvirus and a Phloem-Limited Crinivirus in Sweet Potato Plants. Virology. 2000;(269):26–36. DOI:10.1006/viro.1999.0169
18. Savenkov E.I., Valkonen J.P.T. Potyviral helper componentproteinase expressed in transgenic plants enhances titers of Potato leaf roll virus but does not alleviate its phloem-limitation. Virology. 2001;283(2):285-293. DOI: 10.1006viro.2000.0838
19. Kolychikhina M.S., Beloshapkina O.O., Phiri C. Change in potato productivity under the impact of viral diseases. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;(663). DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/663/1/012035 (In Russ.)
20. Srinivasan R., Alvarez J. M. Effect of Mixed Viral Infections (Potato Virus Y–Potato Leafroll Virus) on Biology and Preference of Vectors Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2007;100(3):646-655. DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[646:EOMVIP]2.0.CO;2
21. Awasthi L.P., Verma H.N. Current status of viral diseases of potato and their ecofriendly management-A critical review. Virol Res Rev. 2017;1(4):1-16. DOI:10.15761/VRR.10001
22. Chatzivassiliou1 E.K., Moschos E., Gazi S., Koutretsis P., Tsoukaki M. Infection of potato crops and seeds with potato virus Y and potato leafroll virus in Greece. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2008;90(2):253-261.
Review
For citations:
Sobko O.A., Fisenko P.V., Kim I.V., Matsishina N.V. Potato viruses of 7 commercial cultivars grown in field Primorsky Krai of Russia. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2022;(1):79-85. https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2022-1-79-85