Morphofunctional characteristics of the tomato male gametophyte under conditions of viral pathogenesis

Relevance. The action of viral phytopathogens changes the quality of the male gametophyte, which ultimately leads to a decrease in plant productivity. So, information on the features of the variability of morphofunctional characteristics of the microgametophyte becomes topical. Taking into account the expression of a part of the plant genome in pollen, the male gametophyte can be used as a reliable system for assessing the response of genotypes to the action of viral pathogens. Presuming that the problems of variability of characteristics of the male gametophyte in conditions of viral pathogenesis have not been enough studied, as well as the main factors determining the variability have not been identified, the aim of the research was to study the effect of viral phytopathogens on the male gametophyte characters in tomato.

Material and methods. Hybrids F1 and varieties of tomato were used in the experiments. Plants were grown in a greenhouse. They were inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) or tomato aspermia virus (TAV) in the 4-5 leaf phase. To determine the quality of pollen, flowers of control and infected plants were collected; pollen was isolated and sown on a nutrient medium. The preparations were analyzed under microscope. The viability of the pollen and the length of the pollen tubes were assessed, and the ratio of these indicators was calculated.

Results. Infection of plants with viruses changes some functional characteristics of the male gametophyte. The responses manifested as stimulation, inhibition, or neutral effect. The main sources of variability in characters of pollen were the genotype and viral agents. In viral pathogenesis, unequal indicators of pollen grains were found in terms of the rate of germination and growth of pollen tubes (PT). Analysis of the heritability coefficients of the ratio of pollen viability and PT length (experiment / control) revealed positive dominance and overdominance in 70% of cases. Genotypes have been identified that combine a high level of viability when infected with different viruses. The prospect of their use in further research is proposed. 

1. Khaliluev M.R., Shpakovsky G.V. Genetic engineering strategies for increasing tomato resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens. Plant physiology. 2013;60(6):721-732. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0015330313050084 (In Russ.)

2. Kotelnikova I.M., Krylov A.V. Lipids in viral infection of plants. Vestnik of Far Eastern Branch. 2001;(4):38-55. (In Russ.)

3. Trang Nguyen Ha Thi Quynh Distribution and pathogenesis of viral diseases on tomatoes in conditions of Vietnam and Russia. Abstract of dissertation for the degree of candidate of biological sciences. М., 2013. (In Russ.)

4. Reunov A.V. Viral pathogenesis and plant defense mechanisms. Vladivostok. 1999. (In Russ.)

5. Johnson M., Harper J., Palanivelu R. A. A Fruitful journey: Pollen tube navigation from germination to fertilization. Annual Review of Plant biology. 2019;(70):809-837. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100133

6. Delph L.F., Johannsson M.H., Stephenson A.G. How environmental factors affect pollen performance ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecol. 1997;78(6):1632-1639. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1632:HEFAPP]2.0.CO;2.

7. Kruglova N.N. Assessment of the pollengrains quality in flowering plants (overview). Bull. of the State Nikita Botan. Gard. 2020;(135):50-56. https://doi.org/10.36305/0513-1634-2020-135-50-56. (In Russ.)

8. Bespalova L.A., Agayev R. A., Agaeva E. V. Morphological features of pollen in wheat varieties and triticale of lukianenko agricultural resesrch institute selection. Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2020;3(157). https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-157-024 (In Russ.)

9. Korol V.G. Pollination and fruit formation in tomato culture in protected ground. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2019;(4):32-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2019-4-32-36

10. Haight F., Gibbs A. Effect of viruses on pollen morphology. Plant Pathology. 2007;32(4):369-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1983.tb02849.x.

11. Razzaq M., Rauf F., Khurshid M. et al. Pollen viability an index of abiotic stresses tolerance and methods for the improved pollen viability. Pakistan jurnalof agricultural reserch. 2019;32(4):609-624. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2019/32.4.609.624

12. Kalyar T., Rauf S., Teixeira S.J.A. Handling sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) populations under heat stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2014;(60):655-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.799276.

13. Tsatsenko L.V., Nazarov A.V., Ledeneva A.R. Pollen analysis in wheat breeding. Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2021;165(01). http://ej.kubagro.ru/2021/01/pdf/09.pdf (In Russ.)

14. Balashova N.N. The action of infectious backgrounds on the reproductive system and offspring of infected plants (for example, tomato culture). 1989. p.16- 27. (In Russ.)